TheCable

The national assembly conference committee on electoral act (amendment) bill has adopted the reordered sequence of the 2019 general election, making presidential poll the last.

Two weeks ago, the house of representatives began the process to amend the electoral act 2010 with the inclusion of section 25(1) in the law.

This was to reorder the sequence of the elections, to commence with national assembly, followed by governorship and state house of assembly, and presidential as last.

This is against the sequence rolled out by Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which put presidential and national assembly elections first and governorship and state assembly to follow.

Suleiman Nazif, chairman of senate committee on INEC, said the bill did not in any way violate any provisions of section 76 of the 1999 constitution which empowered INEC to fix dates and conduct elections.

He said the words “empowering INEC” to that effect were duplicated in the bill just as powers conferred on the national assembly by section 4 (2) of the constitution were exercised in relation to the rescheduling of elections.

Nazif said inclusion of section 25(1) which changed the sequence of election different from the one earlier released by INEC had not violated any provisions of the laws governing the operations of the electoral body.

In his contribution, Edward Pwajok, chairman, house of representatives committee on INEC, said what the house concurred with the senate as was very necessary in giving credibility to the electoral process.

“The sequence of election provision in the bill is not targeted at anybody but aimed at giving credibility to the electoral process,” he said.

“This is by giving the electorate the opportunity to vote based on qualities of candidates vying for national assembly seat.”

Pwajok added that if the bill was given assent by the president, the lawmakers, who based on national interest, adopted it, would invoke constitutional provisions at their disposal to make it see the light of the day.

“Whether it would be assented to or not by the President, as far as we are concerned, remains in the realm of conjuncture for now but if such eventually happens, we will know how to cross the bridge,” he said.

A member of the committee, Dino Melaye (APC-Kogi), said while date for election was the prerogative of INEC, extant laws gave schedules for such elections as sole responsibility of the national assembly.

“So contrary to reports and comments by some Nigerians on the reordered sequence of election, national assembly has not overlapped its boundaries,” he said.