Saraki: Media coalition got facts wrong on Sahara Reporters
Senate President Bukola Saraki has refuted claims by the Coalition for Press Freedom and Whistleblower Protection (CPFWP), a group of media and civil society organisations, which accused him of using violence and impunity against Sahara Reporters, the online media organisation.
In a joint statement signed by 15 of its members, TheCable inclusive, the coalition accused Saraki of abusing the judicial process through the freezing of the bank accounts of Sahara Reporters Media Foundation — a completely different legal entity from Sahara Reporters against whom Saraki secured a N4 billion judgment from a Kwara state high court in a defamation suit.
In his response on Wednesday signed by Yusuph Olaniyonu, his spokesman, Saraki said he had more evidence to show that the two entities operated as one in various transactions.
He also denied stalling the judicial process, blaming Sahara Reporters instead for the delay.
The full statement
Our attention has been drawn to a statement signed by a group of journalists under the aegis of The Coalition for Press Freedom and Whistleblower Protection (
The CPFWP suggests that the alleged intimidation is purportedly on account of a libel case against Sahara Reporters, for which there is an award by the High Court of damages of N4 billion in favour of the Senate President. The statement is misleading, and we are therefore constrained to set the record straight.
Sahara Reporters and the Sahara Reporters Media Foundation are one and the same. It is a known fact that advert payments for Sahara Reporters have on occasion been paid into the bank accounts of the Foundation on the instructions of the publisher, Omoyele Sowore. We have records that show that Sowore has used the two accounts interchangeably over time, particularly for nefarious
It is instructive that, while Sahara Reporters and Sowore were prosecuting their vicious ‘all is fair in war’ agenda against the person of the Senate President, Dr. Saraki chose to put his trust in the rule of law, and sought redress in the court. Saraki has never been an advocate or believer in extra-judicial means, as is the unfortunate suggestion of the CPFWP statement. On the contrary, his recourse was to the law because he has full confidence in the legal process.
Now, we ask the Coalition, what has Dr. Saraki done wrong in this entire process? How does going to the law on his part amount to wrongdoing by the Coalition’s reckoning? If anything, he is the one who has been subject to relentless intimidation and persecution by Sahara Reporters and Mr. Sowore. Where was the Coalition when Sowore, in frequent prejudicial actions, published
It will be recalled that the court case started in December 2015. Until judgement was given against Sowore, he did everything to evade service. When he was eventually served as directed by the court, he refused to enter his defence. It wasn’t until several months after the judgement that the Sahara Reporter publishers filed their appeal. All they have done in the last six months is file motions or documents and withdraw them, over and over again. After wasting much time, at the last sitting of the court, they filed a motion to withdraw the case, to enable them go to the Court of Appeal. We invite members of the public to judge for themselves which party was really responsible for the delay in this matter.
Dr. Saraki has diligently pursued this case, because his interest is for its expeditious determination, so that he can access the 4 billion naira judgement debt in order to use it for the purposes earlier announced. It is therefore not in Dr. Saraki’s interest for the matter to be delayed.
As to the alleged harassment and molestation of Sahara Reporters’ supporters on court premises, the evidence indicates the contrary. It is on record, from news reports published by mediums edited by some of the signatories to the Coalition Statement, that Sowore imported cultists and unsavoury elements from other states to disturb the peace and create chaos on the court premises, all in a desperate bid to show that he has support. The Police merely came in to prevent a breakdown of law and order. We had no hand in the Police decision to intervene or the manner of its execution.
Furthermore, the freezing of the Sahara Reporters Media Foundation account was a decision of the court. We must also point out that it is now part of an ongoing appeal process and therefore sub-judice. We question whether the Coalition Statement does not also amount to interference in the judicial process, given that the case is ongoing. We are of the opinion that all parties concerned should allow the law to take its course.
If any person is aggrieved by the decision of a court, there is a process to be followed. The Coalition Statement strikes us as another way of intimidating the judiciary and frustrating the course of justice. This is the highest form of corruption of the judicial process.
To reiterate, if there is any delay in this particular case, it was caused by Sahara Reporters and its lawyers. If they were not avoiding service, they were busy raising technicalities or requesting unnecessary adjournments. We call on signatories to study the records of the court proceedings, to properly acquaint themselves with the facts.
On a final note, we would like to advise the signatories to the Statement that they should not allow themselves to be railroaded into endorsing the unscrupulous methods for which Sahara Reporters is known. We would like to believe that the signatories do not have the full information surrounding the libel suit. We hope this statement will go some way in clearing up any confusion on their part.
There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?
Write a comment