BY TheCable
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has accused the World Bank of providing “patently insufficient information” on the spending of Sani Abacha loot by the federal government of Nigeria.
The NGO said in a statement on Sunday that it had sent an appeal to the Access to Information (AI) Appeals Board against the World Bank’s failure to disclose full information on the funds recovered from the foreign accounts traced to the former head of state.
SERAP, which had petitioned the World Bank for information on the recovered funds, said the decision is a serious violation of the AI Policy, “as it amounts to improper or unreasonable restriction of access to information”.
In the appeal dated 5 February 2016 and signed by SERAP deputy executive director Olukayode Majekodunmi, the organisation said: “Following receipt of several documents from the World Bank totalling over 700 pages on the Abacha loot, SERAP commenced independent investigations and verification of some of the information supplied with appropriate agencies and institutions of government.
“SERAP is concerned that the World Bank failed and/or neglected to provide several portions of the information requested on the spending of recovered Abacha loot managed by the Bank.
“SERAP notes that one of the guiding principles of the Policy on Access to Information (AI Policy) is recognizing the right to an appeals process when a request for information in the World Bank’s possession is improperly or unreasonably denied.
“SERAP argues that there is a strong public interest case here to override the corporate administrative matters, deliberative information or financial information exceptions of the AI Policy if the information being requested falls under one of these exceptions.
“SERAP believes that it is not harmful for the Bank to disclose specific details of the information requested. SERAP also notes that the sole remedy available to those who prevail in the appeals process is to receive the information requested.”
The body requested the appeals board to exercise its prerogative and allow disclosure of the following specific information and any feedback from the World Bank Evaluation Team on these issues:
This website uses cookies.